| home wellness pelvic health other conditions health videos go shopping contact us | ||||||||||||||||
|
managing incontinence with external catheter collection systemsFor some people with moderate to severe urinary incontinence (urine leakage), an external condom catheter system may the best solution. Men, especially, find external catheters to be convenient and simple to use. There are a few female external catheters available but, so far, they are much less easy to apply and use. One method of managing urinary incontinence (unwanted urine leakage) in men is by using an external condom catheter system or ECCS for collecting the urine that leaks. ECCS systems work well for men with moderate to severe urine leakage or for times when the man cannot make it to the toilet without having an incontinence accident. The ECCS consists of a flexible sheath (also called a condom catheter, Texas catheter, penile sheath, or external male catheter) that is pulled over the penis. The end of the catheter is connected to a long drainage tube and attached to a urinary drainage bag. The sheath is usually made of latex rubber, vinyl, or silicone and easily slips onto the penis. It is held in place either by a double-sided adhesive strap or a strap made of latex or foam that is wrapped around the penis. When the correct-sized sheath is put on and fastened properly, urine will not come in contact with the skin. Both disposable and reusable versions are available but care should be taken to follow some basic wearing time recommendations. Reusable sheaths should be left on for 24 hours only and reapplied after they have been washed and the penis has been washed and dried. The disposable type should be used for only 24 hours also. Studies of Appropriate Use for IncontinenceThere are few published studies that compare the effects of different condom catheters on the skin of the penis, and those studies that do exist were done with disposable types only (Fader, Petterssson, et al., 2001). Also, the studies give conflicting outcomes that leave the safety and use of condom catheters in nursing home and hospital patients in question (Saint et al., 2006). One study in men in a VA Medical Center showed the ECCS to be comfortable and convenient, occasionally leaked urine but nurses at the facility preferred to use condom catheters rather than indwelling catheters (Saint et al., 1999). Further studies need to be done that compare all existing products in terms of improvements in comfort, convenience, and ease and longevity of adherence (Newman and Wein, 2009). In a more recent study of male patients in a hospital, Saint et al. (2006) found a protective effect with the use of condom catheters in men without dementia. In contrast with an indwelling urinary or Foley catheter, the condom catheter users experienced fewer bacteria in the urine, fewer UTIs and a lower death rate. Men also preferred the ECCS for its comfort. Another study by Pemberton et al. (2006) found that external catheters were easy to use and should be applied with gloves for best infection control. These studies do not clarify the role of ECCS use with institutionalized men although their use appears to show a lower risk of bacteriuria than with indwelling catheters. One flaw with these studies is that the majority of data were collected on male patients living in extended care facilities (Ouslander, Greengold & Chen, 1987). In a recent systematic review from Cochrane of men with neurogenic bladder, no conclusions could be drawn about appropriate use of catheter types from existing randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials (Jamison, Maquire, & McCann, 2004). When to Use an ECCS for IncontinenceThe first step in deciding whether an ECCS is appropriate for a particular patient is to perform the following assessment:
Types and Application of ECCS Systems for IncontinenceMany men will try and use several types of condom catheters. They need to find the correct size for each type and learn to put then on and use them correctly. Condom catheter diameters range from 20 to 40 mm in 5 to 10 mm steps. (Newman, 2004) Choosing the best size is very important if you want to use them successfully. ECCS manufacturers provide measurement guides to help find the right size. Once the penis is pulled gently forward, the guide can be place halfway down its shaft to find the best size. If the man is still getting erections, care should be taken to make sure the catheter is large enough to allow for nighttime erections. All men, but especially those who do not have good sensations in their penis and scrotum, should be taught never to use rubber bands or tape to keep on the condom catheter. The catheter itself should fit snugly but not too tight so it does not constrict the penis. If wrinkles in the sheath appear, the catheter size is probably too big. Once the catheter is being used, if a small amount of urine is leaking, squeezing the sheath usually creates a better seal. Adhesives commonly used with ostomy bags can be used with sheaths. A small amount of adhesive is applied to the skin on the penis and allowed to dry before putting on the catheter. It is important that the catheter is put on correctly and by the best methods. There are several ways to attach the catheter to the penis and for collecting urine and they include:
Complications with ECCSsUsing external condom catheters can cause a variety of problems for the user including ischemia, skin irritation, maceration of the penis tip, and penile edema or urethral obstruction. All of these complications occur more frequently when the catheter is not put on correctly or is used for longer than recommended. Complications can also occur under the following conditions:
Condom catheters are more likely to cause problems when they are used improperly or for too long a time period. A man with decreased penile and scrotal sensation may not be aware that problems are starting or may not be aware enough to mention them to caregivers. Nurses who are trained on ECCS use can prevent many of these problems by insuring that correct sizes and application techniques are used and that frequent monitoring is done to catch problems early. Many methods are available for managing urinary incontinence.
References Edlich, R.F., Bailey T., Pine, S.A., Williams, R., Rodeheaver, G.T., & Steers, W.D. (2000). Biomechanical performance of silicone and latex external condom catheters. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 10, 291-299. Fader, M., Pettersson, L., Dean, G., Brooks, R., Cottenden, A.M., & Malone-Lee, J. (2001). Sheaths for urinary incontinence: A randomized crossover trial. BJU International, 88, 367-372. Jamison, J., Maguire, S., & McCann, J. (2004). Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD004375. Linsenmeyer, T.A., Bodner, D.R., Creasey, G.H., Green, B.G., Groah, S.L., & Joseph, A. for the Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. (2006). Bladder management for adults with spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline for health-care providers. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 29, 527-573. Newman, D.K. and Wein, A.J. (2009). Managing and Treating Urinary Incontinence, 2nd Edition, Health Professions Press, Baltimore, Maryland:365-483. Newman, D.K., (2008) Internal and external urinary catheters: a primer for clinical practice. Ostomy Wound Manage. Dec;54(12):18-35. Newman, D.K. (2004a). Incontinence products and devices for the elderly. Urologic Nursing, 24, 316-334. Newman, D.K., Fader, M., & Bliss, D.Z. (2004b). Managing incontinence using technology, devices and products. Nursing Research, 53(6 Suppl.), S42-S48. Ouslander, J.G., Greengold, B., & Chen, S. (1987). External catheter use and urinary tract infections among incontinent male nursing home patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 35, 1063-1070. Pemberton P, Brooks A, Eriksen CM, Frost S, Graham S, Greenman L, et al. (2006). A comparative study of two types of urinary sheath. Nursing Times, 102(7), 36-41. Saint, S., Kaufman, S.R., Rogers, M.A., Baker, P.D., Ossenkop, K., & Lipsky, B.A. (2006). Condom versus indwelling urinary catheters: A randomized trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54,1055-1061. Posted March 2009
|
my shopping cart seekwellness members not a member yet?
|
||||||||||||||
|
26 South Main Street, PMB #162 . Concord, NH 03301 . Phone: 603 397-0103
|
||||||||||||||||